| |
|
Transmission
and clinical manifestations
Lyme disease
is transmitted by the bite of certain deer ticks of the genus Ixodes
infected with the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato ("in
the broad sense"). Annually, 16,000 cases occur in the US and, on the
basis of seroprevalence studies, an estimated 60,000 cases in western
and central Europe. The infection may be asymptomatic, may cause only
erythema migrans (EM, the classic red bull's-eye rash around the site
of the bite), or may cause disseminated disease affecting many organs
and tissues. No EM appears in 20 to 40 percent of infected individuals.
Diagnosis is easier in endemic areas (Figure 1) when the patient reports
having had a tick bite, and disease symptoms include the characteristic
EM, along with flulike symptoms, subsequent joint pain and focal neural
problems. In patients in nonendemic regions, proper diagnosis is much
more difficult. Antibody measurement is therefore a great help in diagnosing
the disease.
Disease
stages
Lyme disease
is divided into three stages that show a certain amount of overlap (Table
1). In stage 1 (early) disease, 3 to 8 weeks after infection, 60
to 80 percent of patients exhibit EM. EM usually subsides within 3 to
4 weeks. In patients who do not exhibit EM, symptoms of the second or
third stage may be the first sign of the infection. In stage 2
disease, 2 to 9 months later, the bacteria have spread via the bloodstream
and established a multisystem infection with characteristic neurological
and myocardial manifestations. Stage 3 disease is characterized
by arthritis, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA) and neurological
manifestations after a long incubation phase of 10 months to 10 years.
In ACA, observed almost exclusively in Europe where it is the most common
late manifestation of Lyme disease, an initially infiltrative phase of
the condition is followed by the atrophic phase: the skin becomes creased,
with a thinness reminiscent of cigarette paper, has livid discolorations
and exhibits plastic protrusion of vessels.
Serotyping
and symptomology
Genetic
studies have identified three pathogenic species of the B. burgdorferi
sensu lato complex: B. burgdorferi sensu stricto ("strict sense"
of B. burgdorferi), B. garinii and B. afzelii. Currently,
two serotyping systems based on the outer surface proteins OspA and OspC
are well established. Eight OspA and 16 OspC serotypes have been identified
on the basis of European and North American isolates' reactivities with
sets of monoclonal antibodies specific for these proteins. The heterogeneous
antigenic profiles of the different Borrelia species are believed
to account for differences in virulence, clinical presentation and epidemiology.
Whereas EM may result from infection with any of the three Borrelia
species pathogenic for humans, clinical manifestations involving other
symptoms show a distinctive geographical pattern. In North America, where
B. burgdorferi sensu stricto is the only species isolated, first-stage
disease is more pronounced than it is in Europe and includes mainly arthritis.
In 60 to 70 percent of US patients, symptoms in addition to EM are seen.
In contrast, any of the three pathogenic species may be isolated from
European Lyme disease patients, but there appears to be a predominance
of B. afzelii isolates from EM and ACA patients, and B. garinii
in patient CSF isolates. Early antibiotic treatment can probably prevent
Lyme arthritis in many patients. Consequently, prompt diagnosis is of
practical importance. Because all three pathogenic species can cause Lyme
arthritis, and because different human immune responses to these species
are possible, it is important that Lyme disease tests be designed with
the differences in various patient populations and geographic regions
in mind.
Recommendations
for two-step testing and interpretation
Assays for
Lyme disease antibodies can provide evidence of previous or current infection;
but to improve test reliability, the FDA supports the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for two-step testing and interpretation
of results, as outlined in Figure 2.
Detection of antibodies
in serum is dependent on the stage of the disease.
In the first stage,
only 40 to 70 percent of patients have detectable antibodies either because
EM was overlooked while present and IgM levels have fallen, or because
an immune complex prevents the availability of the IgM antibodies. Diagnosis
in this stage depends on clinical symptoms. Serology is used to confirm
the clinical diagnosis.
Because 60 to 90 percent
of the patients with stage 2 or 3 disease have detectable antibodies,
serology may be most useful for patients who do not present with EM.
The only exception
is treated patients, in whom a serological response is often not seen
even if the antimicrobial agent has not eliminated all infecting organisms.
A negative serology
result indicates only that there was no serological evidence of infection
with B. burgdorferi. It should not be used as the basis for excluding
Lyme disease as the cause of illness, especially if the blood was collected
within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms. If Lyme disease is suspected,
a second specimen collected 2 to 4 weeks after the first specimen should
be tested. If retesting, screening should be performed again; if this
result is positive or equivocal, testing should proceed to immunoblotting.
Figure 2. US
FDA recommendations for two-step testing and
interpretation for Lyme disease.
Step 1:
Initial Testing
Perform
IgG, IgM or polyvalent assay by EIA or IFA. IgM peaks 3 - 6 weeks
after onset. IgG may rise several weeks later.
|
|
Negative
result
means no serological of Bb*at the time specimen was collected.
|
Positive
or equivocal result
is presumptive evidence of the presence of anti-Bb.* Go to
step 2. Do not report before step 2 is completed.
|
|
Step
2: Supplemental Testing
Test by immunoblot (IB) for IgG & IgM:
IB is more specific than EIA or IFA.
|
|
Negative
result
means no reliable serological evidence of Bb* infection.
Result should not be sole basis for exclusion.
|
Positive
result
provides serological evidence of past or current infection with
Bb.* A positive result can support but not establish a clinical
diagnosis of Lyme disease.
|
DPC
IMMULITE systems Lyme Antibody Screen
The DPC
Lyme Antibody Screen, developed for use on the IMMULITE systems, automates
initial testing for Lyme disease and offers the features listed below.
| Table 2.
DPC Lyme Antibody Screen features. |
| Simple,
polyvalent assay format for combined detection of IgG and IgM against
European and North American Borrelia strains |
| Monoclonal
anti-IgG, anti-IgM conjugate |
| Includes
OspC antigen, for sensitivity in the early stage of B. afzelii
infection |
|
Low
crossreactivity to potentially interfering antigens present in
|
|
|
syphilis |
|
|
autoimmune
disease: SLE, systemic scleroderma |
|
|
diseases
with polyclonal stimulation: rheumatoid arthritis, infectious mononucleosis
(EBV) |
| Good correlation
of IMMULITE/IMMULITE 1000 and IMMULITE 2000 Lyme Antibody Screen with
well-accepted manual EIA methods |
| Chemiluminescent
signal detection system for potentially better discrimination between
positives and negatives |
| Random access
assay: easy to use and less labor intensive |
| Can be used in
combination with the total DPC infectious disease menu |
DPC
I.D. Blot Borrelia
At present,
there is no international standardization of Lyme disease serology testing.
This can lead to high variability in test results, with both false-negative
and false-positive results occurring. For this reason, DPC also offers
I.D. Blot Borrelia IgG and IgM-two qualitative tests for additional
discrepancy testing. They permit visualization of a patient's unique IgG
or IgM antibody response to the various Borrelia antigens. The
I.D. Blot Borrelia tests are not restricted by the sensitivity
and specificity concerns associated with ELISAs, for which a positive
or equivocal result must always be followed with immunoblot confirmation.
Conclusion
DPC's newly
developed and evaluated Lyme Antibody Screen and I.D. Blot Borrelia
are both sensitive and specific for the detection of Borrelia antibodies.
Moreover, the automated Lyme Antibody Screen assay on the IMMULITE family
of systems lowers labor and assay costs.
* Under development.
|
|