| |
Introduction
The acute coronary syndromes represent a continuum of ischemic heart disease
ranging from unstable angina to myocardial infarction with large areas
of cardiac necrosis. They account for approximately 7 million deaths annually
in the world.1 Manifestations of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
include sweating, breathlessness and intense chest pain, but symptoms
can be far milder, more varied and potentially misdiagnosed, especially
in women.2 The recent introduction of more specific cardiac biomarkers
such as the cardiac troponins have contributed to largely modify our current
practice not only with respect to diagnosis and risk assessment, but also
to therapeutic decision making in patients with suspected acute coronary
syndromes. The IMMULITE® 2500 STAT Troponin I assay is one of the newest
assays designed to meet the clinical guidelines for acute myocardial infarction
recommended by the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the American
College of Cardiology (ACC) and the National Academy for Clinical Biochemistry
(NACB). Our evaluation of this product demonstrates that it is a rapid,
sensitive troponin assay that meets the ESC/ACC and NACB criteria as closely
as, or better than, other commercially available assays.
From
the WHO to the ESC/ACC criteria for diagnosis of AMI
AMI corresponds to a loss of cardiac myocytes (necrosis) as a consequence
of prolonged ischemia. In the late 1970s, the World Health Organization
(WHO) proposed a definition of AMI based on the presentation of at least
two of three specific criteria (Table 1), which have now been reexamined.
|
Table
1. ESC/ACC vs. WHO definition of AMI.
|
|
|
 |
|
click
image to enlarge
|
Prior
to the late 1990s, markers such as myoglobin and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB)
were used to assess cardiac damage and to diagnose AMI; these markers
are not specific to cardiac myocytes, however, and can also appear in
serum as a result of skeletal muscle injury. The advent of sensitive and
specific cardiac biomarkersnamely, cardiac troponins I (cTnI) and
T (cTnT)has provided clinicians with completely specific cardiac
markers capable of detecting minor myocardial injury. They have also been
recognized as useful not only for emergency room triage of patients experiencing
an episode of acute chest pain as reported by Hamm, et al.,3 but also
to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.4,5,6
As early as 1996, Antman et al.7 linked the release of cardiac troponin
to an increased risk of subsequent adverse coronary events, clearly demonstrating
that small myocardial injury might be detectable.
This
and other evidence prompted the ESC/ACC to publish a joint document in
2000, redefining AMI (Table 1) according to the concept that "any amount
of myocardial necrosis caused by ischemia should be labelled as an infarct"
and recommending cardiac troponins as the markers of choice.8 It should
be noted that just a year prior to the ESC/ACC position statement, the
NACB, using the WHO criteria, recommended that two decision limits be
used rather than one, with a lower cutoff (97.5 percent) being considered
the threshhold for making a diagnosis of cardiac injury as distinguished
from AMI, which could be diagnosed only at a higher value determined by
an assay's ROC cutoff.9 However, the 2004 NACB guidelines no longer support
this dual-cutoff model and have adopted criteria very similar to those
of the ESC/ACC. The NACB also recommends that laboratories "should perform
STAT cardiac marker testing . . . with a target turnaround time (TAT)
of one hour or less" (i.e., from the time of blood collection to the reporting
of results).10 The evolution of these criteria is illustrated in Figure
1.
|
Figure
1. Evolution of the AMI decision limit (cutoff value).
|
| |
 |
Cardiac
troponin in the context of the ESC/ACC criteria
The reference interval for troponin assays, as defined by the ESC/ACC,
is the 99th percentile of a normal (i.e., healthy) population and is considered
the cutoff value for the diagnosis of AMI. This value should be measurable
with acceptable precision, i.e., the coefficient of variation (CV) ideally
less than or equal to 10 percent. In this regard, the Committee on Standardization
of Markers of Cardiac Damage (CSMCD) of the International Federation of
Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) recently published data showing that, of 13
commercial assays, none was able to achieve a 10% CV at its 99th percentile
cutoff.11 In general, manufacturers are striving to improve the assays
around the 99th percentile value to avoid potentially false-positive analytical
results.10
Complete
necrosis of myocardial cells following an infarction is not immediate
and requires at least 4 to 6 hours; this results in a 3- to 4-hour delay
in the appearance of troponin in the blood after the onset of chest pain.
Consequently, the level observed at the admission of the patient may be
less than the baseline concentration at the 10% CV. Levels should increase
above this value, however, over the initial 24 hours after the occurrence
of an AMI10 and remain high for up to 10 to 14 days. Thus, serial samples
after admission (i.e., at 6 to 9 hours and 12 to 24 hours) are recommended.
Figure 2 presents a typical time course for the release of cTnI following
ischemic cardiac injury.
|
Figure
2. Representative release of cTnI into serum.
|
|
|
 |
The increase
in cardiac troponin can occur in settings other than acute ischemia (spontaneous
ischemia or percutaneous coronary intervention) and, in such cases, clinicians
may have to search for another etiology for the elevation (Table 2).
|
Table
2. Non-AMI-related causes of increase in cardiac troponin.12,13
|
|
|
 |
Our
experience with the new IMMULITE 2500 STAT Troponin I assay
DPC's IMMULITE 2500 STAT Troponin I assay is a solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent
immunometric assay that uses monoclonal murine antibody immobilized on
beads and goat polyclonal antibody labeled with alkaline phosphatase as
the tracer. As in DPC's earlier assays, both antibodies recognize epitopes
localized in the stable N-terminal region of the protein (residues 33
to 110). The different cTnI complexes and isoforms14,15 are also recognized
in almost equal proportions, at least for the tested complexes as described
by Wu et al.15 The reagents have been formulated to minimize the interference
of factors such as heterophilic antibodies, human antimouse antibodies
(HAMA)16 and rheumatoid factor.17 Additionally, the incubation cycle of
this new assay has been reduced to 10 minutes (as compared to the 30 minutes
required by previous assays) and the results are obtainable in 15 minutes,
more than meeting the NACB TAT recommendations mentioned earlier.
The analytical
sensitivity stated in the package insert is 0.10 µg/L. To identify the
lowest concentration associated with a 10% CV, we generated a precision
profile in the low range of concentrations, analyzing eight pools of serum
samples in duplicate once a day over 20 days (one reagent lot and three
calibrations at days 1, 11 and 16). We obtained a 10% CV at 0.29 µg/L
(Figure 3)very close to the value measured from the precision data
in the package insert (which used heparinized samples).
|
Figure
3. Precision profile of the DPC assay with serum.
|
|
|
 |
To determine
the 99th percentile, we analyzed samples obtained from 504 blood donors
(healthy population; 285 males and 219 females; aged 1864 years).
Serum samples were stored at 20°C until cTnI measurement, which
was performed between the 45th and the 120th day of storage. For the study,
the low cTnI concentrations (< 0.10 µg/L) were recalculated from the counts
per second (CPS). As shown in Figure 4, 492 samples (97.6%) had a cTnI
concentration less than or equal to 0.10 µg/L. The calculated median value
was 0.02 µg/L and the 99th percentile was 0.16 µg/L.
|
Figure
4. cTnI concentration distribution.
|
|
|
 |
According
to Panteghini et al.,11 the quality of a cTnI assay is reflected in the
10% CV / 99th percentile ratio. If this ratio is around 2 or less, the
assay is regarded as "good." In the case of the IMMULITE 2500 STAT Troponin
I assay, this ratio (0.29 µg/L / 0.16 µg/L) is less than 2 (1.81), establishing
its quality and proposing a rounded 10% CV cutoff value of 0.30 µg/L.
Conclusion
The performance of this new assay improves the detection of low cTnI concentrations
despite a shortened incubation period. Thus, the assay clearly conforms
to the new criteria defined by the ESC/ACC as well as the NACB guidelines,
although the coefficient of variation at the 99th percentile is slightly
higher than 10% (around 15%).
Editor's
note: A fully detailed DPC technical report titled IMMULITE®
2500 STAT Troponin I: Meeting the New Standards for AMI Diagnosis
(catalog number: ZB235) is now available to international customers. Please
contact your DPC representative to request your copy.
| 1. |
The
world health report: statistical annex. p.120. www.who.int/whr/2004/annex/topic/en/annex_2_en.pdf
(accessed March 2005). |
| 2. |
McSweeney
JC, Cody M, O'Sullivan P, Elberson K, Moser DK, Garvin BJ. Women's
early warning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation
2003;108:2619-23. |
| 3. |
Hamm
CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency
room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing
for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1648-53. |
| 4. |
Apple
FS, Wu AH, Jaffe AS. European Society of Cardiology and American College
of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction:
how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. Am
Heart J 2002;144:981-6. |
| 5. |
Kontos
MC, Shah R, Fritz LM, Anderson FP, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, et al. Implication
of different cardiac troponin I levels for clinical outcomes and prognosis
of acute chest pain patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:958-65. |
| 6. |
Pham
MX, Whooley MA, Evans GT Jr, Liu C, Emadi H, Tong W, et al. Prognostic
value of low-level cardiac troponin-I elevations in patients without
definite acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2004;148:776-82. |
| 7. |
Antman
EM, Tanasijjevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac specific troponin
I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1342-9. |
| 8. |
Braunwald
E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina
and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with
Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:970-1062. |
| 9. |
Wu
AH, Apple FS, Gibler WB, Jesse RL, Warshaw MM, Valdes R Jr. National
Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice:
recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery
diseases. Clin Chem 1999;45:1104-21. |
| 10. |
Storrow
AB, Apple FS, Wu AHB, Jesse R, Francis G, Christenson RH. http://www.nacb.org/lmpg/poct/chp3_cardiac.pdf
(accessed November, 2005). |
| 11. |
Panteghini
M, Pagani F, Yeo KT, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Dati F, et al. Committee
on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage of the IFCC Evaluation
of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations.
Clin Chem. 2004;50: 327-32. |
| 12. |
French
JK, White HD. Clinical implications of the new definition of myocardial
infarction. Heart 2004;90:99-106. |
| 13. |
Jeremias
A, Gibson CM. Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac
troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern
Med. 2005;142:786-91. |
| 14. |
Katrukha
AG, Bereznikova AV, Esakova TV, Pettersson K, Lovgren T, Severina
ME, et al. Troponin I is released in bloodstream of patients with
acute myocardial infarction not in free form but as complex. Clin
Chem 1997;43:1379-85. |
| 15. |
Wu
AH, Feng YJ, Moore R, Apple FS, McPherson PH, Buechler KF, et al.
Characterization of cardiac troponin subunit release into serum after
acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays for troponin
T and I. American Association for Clinical Chemistry Subcommittee
on cTnI Standardization. Clin Chem 1998;44:1198-208. |
| 16. |
Fitzmaurice
TF, Brown C, Rifai N, Wu AH, Yeo KJ. False increase of cardiac troponin
I with heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem 1998;44:2212-3. |
| 17. |
Onuska
KD, Hill SA. Effect of rheumatoid factor on cardiac troponin I measurement
using two commercial measurement systems. Clin Chem 2000;46:307-8. |
|